#73 Identity Politics | Commander!

Dr. Stephen Phinney: The President is the Commander in Chief of the military, granting authority over the Army, Navy, and state militias when called into service.

---

Listen to the podcast version:

Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution outlines the powers and responsibilities of the President of the United States.

It establishes the President as the Commander in Chief of the military, granting authority over the Army, Navy, and state militias when called into service. The section also gives the President the power to grant pardons and reprieves, except in cases of impeachment.

Additionally, it defines the President’s role in foreign affairs, allowing them to make treaties with other nations, provided two-thirds of the Senate approves. The President also has the authority to nominate ambassadors, Supreme Court justices, and other federal officers, but these appointments require Senate confirmation.

This section ensures a balance of power, as the President must seek advice and consent from the Senate for key decisions, reinforcing accountability and oversight within the executive branch.

A Commander-in-Chief needs to do two things. One, tell the truth to the troops, and two, give them what they need to win the war." — Oliver North

DON’T TELL ME WHAT TO DO!

Victory in war depends on discipline, strategy, and the ability to follow orders with precision. Without command and structure, chaos takes hold, leaving troops vulnerable and ineffective. A soldier who refuses direction becomes a liability, and an army without leadership crumbles. History proves that those who respect authority, trust the chain of command, and execute orders with wisdom are the ones who secure triumph in battle.

Stephen, the toughest decision on the battlefield is when faced with a fellow soldier who refuses to do what has been commanded of them. At times, it requires us to remove them from the battlefield, one way or another. -Dad

I have never forgotten those words! My father was a trained assassin for the United States Government. In one confession, weeping uncontrollably, he confessed the number of people he was required to “take out” during his military career. I was shocked by my father’s level of loyalty!

While he told me many stories I can never share, he made one thing clear—if the Commander-in-Chief “barks out an order,” our oath to serve as combatants to the US Government requires us to fulfill such orders precisely.

My father's training in this principle drives me to honor and obey every command that comes forth from my Commander’s mouth—Yeshua. However, as a cultural historian, I am aware that this single principle has faded into wokism.

A VIOLANT CULTURE OF PACIFIST

The paradox of pacifists engaging in violent demonstrations highlights the inconsistency within an ideology that advocates for peace yet resorts to hateful aggression to convey its message. While the intent may be to oppose violence, such actions undermine the very principles of nonviolence and create confusion about the movement's true intent. This contradiction weakens the supposed confession of pacifism and raises questions about the effectiveness of using force to promote “peace.” In reality, it confesses that they are people of war.

My father once said, "Pacifists are cowards unless it was God who told them not to go to war." That is a powerful statement coming from the son of a pacifist preacher. In this, he was able to honor his father and his passion for fighting for his country. With grandpa’s blessing, my father was released to defend his country for twenty-one years. This is the “why” I call my day my hero!

It’s deeply challenging for me to witness individuals who claim to champion pacifism resort to hate speech and violent actions in real time. This contradiction not only undermines the credibility of their message but also creates confusion and frustration for those who genuinely understand war and peace. Since the “peace movement” strongly replicates the Antichrist’s modality of function, I have little respect for those propagating such ideologies.

Could it be that pacifists hate being told what to do?

The role of the U.S. military has devolved over time, with some arguing that it has shifted toward a more passive peacekeeping approach rather than maintaining its traditional warrior stance. While peacekeeping efforts aim to stabilize regions and prevent conflict, concerns have been raised about whether this shift undermines the military’s core mission and abilities of defense and deterrence. Organically, the Commander-in-Chief is responsible for maintaining a strong, combat-ready force for essential national security, ensuring that America remains prepared to protect its interests at all costs.

Before accusing me of being a warmonger, the word "war" is mentioned approximately 225 times in the Bible, appearing in 220 verses across various translations. The Bible discusses war in different contexts, including historical battles, spiritual warfare, and prophetic visions. For example, Ecclesiastes 3:8 states, "a time for war, and a time for peace," emphasizing that war is part of the human experience as it relates to the sovereign mission of God, noting most of the prophecies in the Bible include “war” in some fashion or another. It takes the wisest among men to understand this level of wisdom.

War and peace require a Commander-in-Chief!

The primary responsibility of a Commander in Chief is to protect and uphold the freedoms of their nation, ensuring that its people remain safe from threats both foreign and domestic. This duty requires firm leadership (which today’s culture refutes), decisive action, and a commitment to maintaining a strong military capable of deterring adversaries. While diplomacy is a vital tool for sustaining peace, a leader must also be willing to defend the nation through military force when necessary, demonstrating strength and resolve in the face of aggression. A country’s sovereignty and security rest on the unwavering commitment of its Commander in Chief to safeguard its principles at all costs.

Think briefly about how and why Yeshua picks a fight (war) with all the nations on earth, the battle of Armageddon (Revelation 19:11-21). His logic in doing this? To set the stage for His one-thousand-year peace on earth.

Isaiah 2:4 – "He shall judge between the nations, and shall decide disputes for many peoples; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore."

However, when a sitting President functions under this logic, he is considered a warmonger, a dictator, or an offender of democracy.

Really? Not this brave lone warrior! I have enough wisdom to know that it takes a war to end a war. Don’t take my word for it; study the 1,817 prophecies noted in the Holy Word of God and you will soon discover that God is a God of war FOR peace.

So, what is a responsible believer to do?

Stand firm in your commitment to support your Commander in Chief, both in earthly governance and spiritual leadership. True peacekeepers lead by example, embodying integrity, respect, and unwavering faith in war principles, often producing peace. Reject the hypocrisy of those who claim peace but sow discord, and instead, be a beacon of unity and strength in and through Yeshua. Your actions can inspire others to honor authority and uphold the values that sustain freedom and justice.

Side note: I believe the primary reason the masses don’t recognize the real Yeshua and how the replica, the Antichrist, will dominate the world in the end, is due to viewing God’s Son as a pacifist.

Dr. Stephen Phinney is a theologian, author, and speaker with a passion for helping individuals discover their true identity in Christ. His extensive knowledge and compassionate demeanor make him a guiding light for those seeking to understand the depths of spiritual transformation.

Judge Mark T. Boonstra & Dr. Phinney are co-writers of the Identity Politics series. Their mission is to reestablish the founding father’s faith and commitment to building one nation under God.